Once that is known and doesn't have to be uncovered by trial and errorĪnd reading the code, then it is at least relatively straightforward for
Supported compiler and the naming convention(s) used in the batch files. Out the location and search pattern used to locate a given vendor's Simple roadmap thru the sequence of m-files and the perl script to lay Puzzler were hidden not making those changes.Īs far as what I was suggesting, it wouldn't take much other than a That hard what was hard was figuring out where the pieces of the Version of the compiler I use found, it turns out it wasn't _really_ "Complicated and fragile" I'll certainly agree with.Īlthough, after finally digging through it enough to get the current Too confusing AND get out of date too quickly. Help very much to document how to update it. Because it was not designed to be extensible, it would not TheĮxisting options file/ STP-file interface is NOT. Love to have a clean interface that was designed to be extensible. We have no interest in hiding the way we support compilers. There's no reason why a user of a given compiler should lose theįacility to keep up w/ version upgrades simply because TMW is soĭogmatic about hiding the keys to the kingdom.Īs one of the people responsible for compiler support updates, I wish it Process more thoroughly - it would undoubtedly pay dividends to them byįewer support issues as well as being a service to the user community. It would be, imo, _a_good_thing_ for TMW to document the mex -setup Likelihood it is possible given sufficient perseverance on the end Of which files have to be where and for which environment variables toīe what values, etc., etc., for the mex -setup script to function for a I've an older release of ML and can attest that it takes a significantĪmount of time to delve through the scripts to figure out the specifics
TMW is awfully coy and convoluted in the implementation of the batch Would have to change a bunch of little things in the options files. If you want to work with an unsupported compiler my guess is that you Refer to a specific version and we assume you know that you are We assume you read the direction in setup that At the point where you did that, we no longer do Install directory of version 11.1 to your 12.0 location, the software Regarding the ifort error you are seeing. Our best to stay as current as possible with Intel. We do understand your concern regarding the frequency with which Intel That is unfortunate, you should contact Intel to see if they will offer I'm sorry that the evaluation level of support is not working for you. Since Intel does still offer that Fortran compiler forĦ4-bit, we do consider MATLAB supporting Fortran MEX on 64-bit systems.
As Mark said, if you have a license for Composer 2011, then you can get
0 kommentar(er)
